Soul Food Cinema   
Christian Movie Reviews and Discussion
  Antwone Fisher   Stand by Me   Jesus of Nazareth The Passion of The Christ Rabbit-proof Fence   Amazing Grace   Il Postino  
Homepage Suggest a film for the database 
spacer
spacer
Getting Started

About SFC

Chat Forum
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Top 100 Films

Other Film Lists

Top 100 Family Films
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Contact & Feedback

Questions

Resouces & Links
spacer
spacer
Search Soul Food Cinema:
spacer
spacer
spacer

 

Romeo and Juliet (1968)
 
© Paramount Pictures (1968)
SFC Reviewer's Opinion:
Limited Recommendation

Genre
Drama / Romance
   
Synopsis

Italian director Franco Zeffirelli stunned the world when he cast two young unknowns to portray the star crossed lovers in 'Romeo and Juliet', but it was a gamble that resulted in one of the most popular motion pictures of the time, winning international acclaim and two Academy Awards. Shakespeare's classic romance comes to life in a modern, young person's interpretation, bringing new vitality and a fresh insight to the most durable love story ever written.

   
Directed by  
Franco Zeffirelli
   
Written by  
William Shakespeare (play); Franco Brusati (screenplay); Masolino D'Amico (screenplay); Franco Zeffirelli (screenplay).
   
Starring  
Leonard Whiting (Romeo); Olivia Hussey (Juliet); John McEnery (Mercutio); Milo O'Shea (Friar Laurence); Pat Heywood (The Nurse); Robert Stephens (The Prince of Verona); Michael York (Tybalt); Bruce Robinson (Benvolio); Paul Hardwick (Lord Capulet); Natasha Parry (Lady Capulet); Antonio Pierfederici (Lord Montague); Esmeralda Ruspoli (Lady Montague); Roberto Bisacco (Paris); Roy Holder (Peter); Keith Skinner (Balthazar). Please contact SFC to add other cast members and characters.
 

Length (mins):
138
Ratings:
PG (PG)
Language:
ENG

Big 5 Oscar Wins:
0
Big 5 Oscar Noms:
2
IMDB page:
Link

-
Important: the following essays and comments are authored by Soul Food Cinema readers. Whilst the Editor prays for the spiritual integrity of all content of this site, it should be noted that these represent personal opinions and carry no official endorsement. If you consider any content to be a misrepresentation of Catholic teaching, please contact SFC. May God bless you and enlighten you in your reading.
-
Articles, Essays and Reviews
-
Please contact SFC if you are interested in submitting an essay on this film.
-
Readers' Comments and Opinions
-
Click the link to comment on this film. You may like to copy the film title and year (as given above) to your clipboard now for pasting into the following form.
-
  The Idolatry of Romantic Love  
  Mark Banks (United Kingdom)  
  Opinion: Limited Recommendation  

I hope I'm not giving too much away to say that the narrator at the very end of Romeo and Juliet tells us "For never was there a tale of more woe than this of Juliet and her Romeo". And it's the different interpretations of 'woe' that can be taken from this statement that lead to the ambiguity of the overall moral that can be taken from the story of Romeo and Juliet. Should woe mean 'distress', 'misery' or 'sadness', it could well be taken that the moral of the story is a cautionary one; warning the reader (or in this case the viewer) that these are the things that will inevitably come about as a result of the idolatry of romantic love. However, should woe simply be taken to mean 'misfortune' as in something more akin to bad luck, then the moral of the story is simply that here were two lovers that had their whole lives ahead of them, but a simple case of misinterpretation (with regard to Juliet's death) resulted in the death of them both. What Shakespeare's intentions were I do not know (I've only ever once read the play and have now forgotten it), but in this film adaptation I fear the interpretation is willed to be seen as the latter of the two explanations: one in which the outcome is seen more as an unfortunate accident. Were the intention to warn on the dangers of idolising romantic love, a simple but significant cautionary speech, or a change in direction with respect to the emphasis on the characters' acting, could have been included at some point to give the film more of a feel of a tragedy, and less of a romance; the like of which some youth may wish to emulate. As for the rest of the film, the acting is good, though Olivia Hussey's performance was not quite strong enough to sustain the amount of screen time she was given. The sets and costumes were good; though Juliet's over-the-top bust-revealing dress at the balcony scene meant an inconvenient asserted effort to avert my eyes. This, combined with the brief scenes of partial nudity elsewhere in the film, also mean I'd raise the age rating to at least a 12, from its current PG certificate. Other than that, the poetic language of Shakespeare was re-created to good effect; even if my comprehension of all that was going on went by the wayside in the process. Overall, the technical qualities of this production are very good, but I have strong reservations about its thematic content.

 

 

spacerRecent Articles & Essays
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacerRecent Interviews
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
"Let us discern for ourselves what is
right; let us learn together what is good" (Job 34:4)
spacer
   

 

   
 
© Copyright Soul Food Cinema 2010. Terms of quotations and reproductions.
 
Soul Food Cinema - Movie/Film Reviews and Discussion from the World's Catholic-Christian Community
Images in the header are from: Antwone Fisher (© Fox Searchlight, 2002); Stand by Me (© Columbia Pictures, 1986); Jesus of Nazareth (© ITV (1977); The Passion of The Christ (© Newmarket Films, 2004); Rabbit-proof Fence (© Buena Vista, 2002); Amazing Grace (© Bristol Bay Productions, 2006) and Il Postino (© Cecchi Gori Group, 1994).